Talcott Parsons' "Sick Role" Revisited : An
anthropological commentary on key concept of medical sociology
Mitzub'ixi Qu'q Ch'ij
☆From my anthropological perspectivism, this paper examines in Talcott Parsons' "Sick Role" theory, one of the most important concepts of medical sociology. This paper has three divisions that I have worked; In the fi rst part, there is my general review of the sick role theory of one of Parsons' opera, The Social System (1951). In the second part, Series of critiques on Parsons' thesis on the sick role are introduced by indicating counterevidence that cannot aff ord to his theory. And in the third part, three points of author's recommendation are mentioned, so to say, that the theory should be required renewal by absorbing in the theories on social aspect of illness and healing process, introducing chronological aspect to dynamic analysis on the sick role theory, and elaborating with comparison between sick role and health role.
From my anthropological perspectivism, this paper examines in Talcott Parsons' "Sick Role" theory, one of the most important concepts of medical sociology. This
paper has three divisions that I have worked; In the fi rst part, there is my general
review of the sick role theory of one of Parsons' opera, The Social System (1951). In
the second part, Series of critiques on Parsons' thesis on the sick role are introduced
by indicating counterevidence that cannot aff ord to his theory. And in the third part,
three points of author's recommendation are mentioned, so to say, that the theory
should be required renewal by absorbing in the theories on social aspect of illness
and healing process, introducing chronological aspect to dynamic analysis on the sick
role theory, and elaborating with comparison between sick role and health role.
|
|
[A]n outsider's perspective can provide new insights, because it sidesteps the shared premises and practices -- Steve Joshua Heims [1993:viii] | |
Consider what eff ects, which might conceivably have practical bearings, we conceive the object of our conception to have. Then, our conception of these effects is the whole of our conception of the object -- Charles S. Peirce(1878)[Peirce 1958:402] | |
リ ンク
文 献
そ の他の情報
CC
Copyleft,
CC, Mitzub'ixi Quq Chi'j, 1996-2099