Contents of "The ethics toolkit"
by Julian Baggini and Peter S. Fosl
1.1 Aesthetics. |
1.2 Agency. |
1.3 Authority. |
1.4 Autonomy. |
1.5 Care. |
1.6 Character. |
1.7 Conscience. |
1.8 Evolution. |
1.9 Finitude. |
1.10 Flourishing. |
1.11 Harmony. |
1.12 Interest. |
1.13 Intuition. |
1.14 Merit. |
1.15 Natural Law. |
1.16 Need. |
1.17 Pain and pleasure. |
1.18 Revelation. |
1.19 Rights. |
1.20 Sympathy. |
1.21 Tradition and history. |
||||
2.1 Consequentialism. |
2.2 Contractarianism. |
2.3 Cultural critique. |
2.4 Deontological ethics. |
2.5 Discourse Ethics. |
2.6 Divine command. |
2.7 Egoism. |
2.8 Hedonism. |
2.9 Naturalism. |
2.10 Particularism. |
2.11 Perfectionism. |
2.12 Pragmatism. |
2.13 Rationalism. |
2.14 Relativism. |
2.15 Subjectivism. |
2.16 Virtue ethics. |
||||
3.1 Absolute/Relative. |
3.2 Act/Rule. |
3.3 Bad/evil. |
3.4 Beneficence/non-maleficence. |
3.5 Cause/reason. |
3.6 Cognitivism/non-cognitivism. |
3.7 Commission/omission. |
3.8 Consent. |
3.9 Facts/values. |
3.10 The Golden Mean. |
3.11 Honour/shame. |
3.12 Individual/collective. |
3.13 Injury. |
3.14 Intentions/consequences. |
3.15 Internalism/externalism. |
3.16 Intrinsic/instrumental Value. |
3.17 Legal/moral. |
3.18 Liberation/oppression. |
3.19 Means/ends. |
3.20 Metaethics/normative ethics. |
3.21 Moral subjects/moral agents. |
3.22 Prudence. |
3.23 Public and private. |
3.24 Stoic cosmopolitanism. |
|
4.1 Alienation. |
4.2 Authenticity. |
4.3 Consistency. |
4.4 Counterexamples. |
4.5 Fairness. |
4.6 Fallacies. |
4.7 Impartiality and Objectivity. |
4.8 The 'is/ought' gap. |
4.9 Justice and lawfulness. |
4.10 Just war theory. |
4.11 Paternalism. |
4.12 Proportionality. |
4.13 Reflective equilibrium. |
4.14 Restoration. |
4.15 Sex and gender. |
4.16 Speciesism. |
4.17 Thought Experiments. |
4.18 Universalisability. |
||
5.1 Akrasia. |
5.2 Amoralism. |
5.3 Bad faith and self-deception. |
5.4 Casuistry and Rationalisation. |
5.5 Fallenness. |
5.6 False consciousness. |
5.7 Free Will and Determinism. |
5.8 Moral Luck. |
5.9 Nihilism. |
5.10 Pluralism. |
5.11 Power. |
5.12 Radical particularity. |
5.13 Scepticism. |
5.14 The Separateness of Persons. |
5.15 Standpoint. |
5.16 Supererogation. |
5.17 Tragedy |
The
Ethics Toolkit (- > Japanese editon) provides an accessible and engaging compendium of
concepts, theories, and strategies that encourage students and advanced
readers to think critically about ethics so that they can engage
intelligently in ethical study, thought, and debate. * Written by the
authors of the popular The Philosophers' Toolkit (Blackwell, 2001);
Baggini is also a renowned print and broadcast journalist, and a
prolific author of popular philosophy books* Uses clear and accessible
language appropriate for use both inside and beyond the classroom*
Enlivened through the use of real-world and hypothetical examples*
Cross-referencing of entries helps to connect and contrast ideas*
Features lists of prominent ethics organizations and useful websites*
Encourages readers to think critically about ethics and teaches them
how to engage intelligently in ethical study, thought, and
debate。Source: https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA82806392
Structure
Contents
Acknowledgements.
INTRODUCTION.
I The Grounds of Ethics.
1.1 Aesthetics.
1.2 Agency.
1.3 Authority.
1.4 Autonomy.
1.5 Care.
1.6 Character.
1.7 Conscience.
1.8 Evolution.
1.9 Finitude.
1.10 Flourishing.
1.11 Harmony.
1.12 Interest.
1.13 Intuition.
1.14 Merit.
1.15 Natural Law.
1.16 Need.
1.17 Pain and pleasure.
1.18 Revelation.
1.19 Rights.
1.20 Sympathy.
1.21 Tradition and history.
II Frameworks for Ethics.
2.1 Consequentialism.
2.2 Contractarianism.
2.3 Cultural critique.
2.4 Deontological ethics.
2.5 Discourse Ethics.
2.6 Divine command.
2.7 Egoism.
2.8 Hedonism.
2.9 Naturalism.
2.10 Particularism.
2.11 Perfectionism.
2.12 Pragmatism.
2.13 Rationalism.
2.14 Relativism.
2.15 Subjectivism.
2.16 Virtue ethics.
III Central Concepts in Ethics.
3.1 Absolute/Relative.
3.2 Act/Rule.
3.3 Bad/evil.
3.4 Beneficence/non-maleficence.
3.5 Cause/reason.
3.6 Cognitivism/non-cognitivism.
3.7 Commission/omission.
3.8 Consent.
3.9 Facts/values.
3.10 The Golden Mean.
3.11 Honour/shame.
3.12 Individual/collective.
3.13 Injury.
3.14 Intentions/consequences.
3.15 Internalism/externalism.
3.16 Intrinsic/instrumental Value.
3.17 Legal/moral.
3.18 Liberation/oppression.
3.19 Means/ends.
3.20 Metaethics/normative ethics.
3.21 Moral subjects/moral agents.
3.22 Prudence.
3.23 Public and private.
3.24 Stoic cosmopolitanism.
IV Assessment, Judgement & Critique.
4.1 Alienation.
4.2 Authenticity.
4.3 Consistency.
4.4 Counterexamples.
4.5 Fairness.
4.6 Fallacies.
4.7 Impartiality and Objectivity.
4.8 The 'is/ought' gap.
4.9 Justice and lawfulness.
4.10 Just war theory.
4.11 Paternalism.
4.12 Proportionality.
4.13 Reflective equilibrium.
4.14 Restoration.
4.15 Sex and gender.
4.16 Speciesism.
4.17 Thought Experiments.
4.18 Universalisability.
V The Limits of Ethics.
5.1 Akrasia.
5.2 Amoralism.
5.3 Bad faith and self-deception.
5.4 Casuistry and Rationalisation.
5.5 Fallenness.
5.6 False consciousness.
5.7 Free Will and Determinism.
5.8 Moral Luck.
5.9 Nihilism.
5.10 Pluralism.
5.11 Power.
5.12 Radical particularity.
5.13 Scepticism.
5.14 The Separateness of Persons.
5.15 Standpoint.
5.16 Supererogation.
5.17 Tragedy
++
Files with pasword
Links
Bibliography
other informations
Copyleft, CC, Mitzub'ixi Quq Chi'j, 2099
For all undergraduate students!!!, you do not paste but [re]think my
message.
Remind Wittgenstein's phrase, "I should not like my writing to spare
other people the trouble of thinking. But, if possible, to stimulate
someone to thoughts of his own," - Ludwig Wittgenstein